If a hardcore PETA activist was in danger of getting killed in the wilderness and had a gun?

Do you think the PETA activist would let the wild animal kill them, or shoot the animal to save themselves? What would you believe would prevail, the persons beliefs, or the persons desire to live? This is just a random question. I don't mean to offend anyone, sorry in advance if I do in any way.If a hardcore PETA activist was in danger of getting killed in the wilderness and had a gun?
I don't know. They're a weird bunch. Probably shoot themselves because they value an animals life more than their own... an animal that was just about to eat them.
Oh you will offend some people, people always get offended.. PETA will get naked in public (Even if public nudity is against their beliefs and it would embarrass them) to save a Lobster or Cockroach.. Come on..



I am not PETA, I eat meat but dont like to watch those hunting shows cause I hate hearing the animal noises when they get shot. But we do need them to survive cause we need protein for health and energy.



Also do PETA realize if ALL meat eaters converted to their lifestyle how OVER POPULATED the world would be with the animals we kill for food.. We would be suffocated by them... Seriously...If a hardcore PETA activist was in danger of getting killed in the wilderness and had a gun?
first of all, I doubt very highly that any PETA activist would be carrying a gun big enough to stop an attack from the types of animals most likely to attack a human, and there are not that many animals that will



but, I think you have never heard of Timothy Treadwell, a famous animal activist who was eaten by a bear
The instinct for survival would take over.
This is a really dumb question.
I agree w/RAY... Ammianus is right on.