Nope, none there is no evidence that the Jews were slaves in Egypt, or that any plagues occurred and there would be records if every first born son died, Not to mention the frogs, and locusts, and boils.
Not as far as im aware.
The story probably came about because there were a lot of nomadic tribes around in biblical times, some might have been jews. This just got exaggerated and embelished by the bibles authors to spin a good yarn.
It could even have been a folk tale from one of the tribes to explain their place in the world, which the bibles creators just nicked (like most of it really).Is there any evidence that the Jews wandered in the wilderness for 40 years?
you mean like dinosaur bones or something?
you have the written history of a people that is still living. Scientists do not have a problem believing the written history of dead civilizations, why would a living one be any different.
Sandle prints all around Zion.
Some claim they are made by tourists, but true believers are faithful that they are the originals, even if some of them have a Nike swoosh.
A single manna fruitcake, that has been regifted from generation to generation ever since.
a written document...The Bible
plus the stories passed down through the generations.
None whatsoever.
All the wild life in the egyptian desert have skull caps and cut wieners.
That's how you tell.
If they had been cooking bacon in the promise land they could have just followed the smell!!
They actually went to Kashmir and stayed there for that time.
No. Not 1 bit of it.
they finally found the penny they were looking for...
that was only 3500 years ago, surely foot prints can be found
didn't we all wander in the wilderness?
No comments:
Post a Comment