Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Who would survive longer Palin on the south side of Chicago or Obama in the Alaska wilderness?

With or without their security detail doesn't matter, whichever way you would like to answer. Maybe another reality show in the making eh?Who would survive longer Palin on the south side of Chicago or Obama in the Alaska wilderness?
Lol. Palin looked terrified of Katie Couric, I'm positive she wouldn't last 4 minutes on the South side of Chicago.
Lol..thats a tough one. I'd have to go with Palin getting taken out first in Chicago though, thats a rough place!Who would survive longer Palin on the south side of Chicago or Obama in the Alaska wilderness?
If both have guns, Palin.



If both don't have guns, Obama.
Palin, with or without a gun.
Obama would. Palin couldn't pass up the shoe sales.
I've got to go with Obama on this one.



Palin - 10 minutes



Obama - 4 hours
Palin with the secret service.

Obama would bring death to his whole camp out there.
Palin. She seems pretty tough and has probably wrestled a moose or two.
Palin would have a gun, so she would at least be armed like the rest of the people. Obama, I just don't see as having a lot of survival skills for the wilderness. I think he would be a lot like Christopher McCandless- book smart...but....
If Obama would do it then every helicopter in Alaska would be air born.
not trying to be sexist , but the lady does have some attributes that

might save her for a moment or two; however in the guy's case--I don't

think the polar bears would give a @#$$$%
Obama. Palin would be lost.
Palin would be pack'n. South side gang bangers would be well advised to stay out of range of her Glock.



True the gang bangers have guns too, Palin would not be high on crack - advantage Palin.
Look how many "black" people live Alaska.
Obama, guns or no guns.



Edit- Sharpshooter so she says, but she says a lot of things.

No comments:

Post a Comment